Epic Games Sues Samsung and Google Over Access to Third-Party App Stores

Epic Games has reignited its legal battle against tech giants Samsung and Google, accusing them of anti-competitive behavior by restricting access to third-party app stores. This move comes shortly after Epic expanded the availability of its games, including Fortnite, to platforms beyond the Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store.

The Allegations: Anti-Competitive Behavior

 

In a post on its website, Epic Games claims that Samsung’s “Auto Blocker” feature, which was initially an opt-in service, is now on by default as of July. This change, Epic alleges, makes it increasingly difficult for users to access third-party app stores like AltStore Pal or OneStore. The company states it takes 21 steps for Samsung mobile users to disable Auto Blocker and access alternative stores.

 

Epic games further accuses Google of being complicit in this strategy, stating,

“Auto Blocker cements the Google Play Store as the only viable way to get apps on Samsung devices, blocking every other store from competing on a level playing field.”

 

The Legal Context: Epic’s Ongoing Fight

 

This lawsuit is the latest move in a years-long battle Epic games has waged against Apple and Google over the control of app distribution and fees. Epic argues that both companies maintain monopolistic practices by charging a 30% fee on all app and in-game sales made through their platforms, stifling competition and innovation in the process.

 

Previous Legal Battles

 

Epic sued Apple and Google in 2020, accusing them of monopolistic behavior. The company won a significant victory against Google in late 2023 when a U.S. court ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws by maintaining its app store as the dominant platform for Android devices.

However, Epic’s battle with Apple has been more challenging, with the company losing major cases in 2021 and 2023.

 

Legal Implications: The outcome of this new lawsuit could set a significant precedent for how tech companies manage their app stores in the future. If Epic wins, it could force Google and Samsung to relax their control over app distribution, allowing third-party stores greater access to mobile users.

 

Impact on Developers: Greater Freedom or More Risks?

 

If Epic’s lawsuit succeeds, developers could benefit from more freedom to choose where they distribute their apps. Currently, many small and mid-sized developers are forced to list their apps on Google Play or the App Store to reach a broader audience, paying steep fees in the process.

However, with third-party stores, developers could retain a higher percentage of their earnings and avoid restrictive terms set by Google and Apple.

 

Data Insight: According to a 2023 report from AppFigures, the Google Play Store commands over 70% of the Android app distribution market globally, while Apple’s App Store controls nearly 60% of iOS app distribution. By comparison, third-party app stores like Samsung Galaxy Store and OneStore barely make a dent, collectively accounting for less than 5% of app distribution.

 

Security Concerns: Apple and Google argue that their tightly controlled ecosystems are essential for maintaining security and protecting users from malware. With third-party app stores, there may be increased risks of malware and data breaches, which could deter users from exploring alternative platforms.

 

Consumer Implications: What’s at Stake for Users?

 

From a consumer standpoint, the lawsuit could impact how users interact with their devices and the apps they download. Currently, Samsung and Google claim that their policies, such as the Auto Blocker feature, are designed to enhance user safety and provide better control over personal data. However, Epic contends that these features limit user choice and unfairly favor the Google Play Store.

 

Expert Insight: “This lawsuit could serve as a landmark case in digital rights, particularly for consumers who feel locked into specific app ecosystems,” says tech analyst Sarah Thompson. “While Epic’s argument for competition is valid, it’s also important to consider the potential trade-offs in security and convenience.”

 

User Experience: If the lawsuit results in more third-party store access, users may have more flexibility in how they download apps, including potential cost savings. However, navigating additional security settings, like disabling Auto Blocker, may create friction for less tech-savvy users.

 

Global Impact: Regulatory Trends in the EU and Beyond

 

The legal landscape is shifting rapidly, particularly in Europe, where the European Union (EU) has been cracking down on monopolistic practices among tech companies. The EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), set to fully come into effect in 2024, aims to increase competition and reduce the dominance of major players like Apple and Google.

 

Market Analysis: The European Union’s stricter regulations could pave the way for Epic to gain more traction in Europe. In fact, Epic has already begun offering its games via third-party stores more easily in the EU than in the U.S., due to these favorable regulations. By contrast, U.S. antitrust laws are still catching up, with cases like Epic’s being seen as litmus tests for future tech regulations.

 

The Road Ahead: What This Means for App Distribution

 

The lawsuit between Epic Games and the tech giants highlights the growing tension over control of app ecosystems. The outcome of this case will likely influence how app distribution evolves in the coming years, particularly as governments worldwide increase scrutiny on monopolistic practices in the tech industry.

 

Final Thoughts: For developers, a win for Epic could mean more control over their profits and distribution channels. For consumers, it could mean more freedom of choice, but at the potential cost of added security risks. As the legal battle unfolds, it will serve as a pivotal moment in the fight for digital freedom and competition.

 

Engage with us

What do you think of this scenario between tech giants Samsung and Epic games?

Answer in the comments